Gaurav v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The applicant moved for bail in a criminal matter. The Court held the application to be infructuous based on the counsel's statement and dismissed it without engaging in substantive adjudication.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:181092
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 39203 of 2020
Applicant :- Gaurav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Upendra Upadhyay,Kamalendra Kumar Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant has made a statement that this bail application has become infructuous. Hence it may be dismissed as infructuous.
This bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 15.9.2023 Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Gaurav
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/39203/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court