Hargovind v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
No. - 2023:AHC:178749 Court No. - 64 Case :-…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:178749
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 25957 of 2019
Applicant :- Hargovind Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Dixit,Devesh Kumar Verma,Suresh Chandra Verma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Kumar Mishra
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant.
Sri Pankaj Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the informant has made a statement that this bail application has become infructuous. Hence it may be dismissed as infructuous.
This bail application is dismissed as infructuous on the basis of statement of counsel for informant.
Order Date :- 15.9.2023 Ruchi Agrahari
Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Hargovind
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/25957/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court