This Single Judge criminal bail application was heard by the Allahabad High Court. The court rejected bail for the applicant under Section 439 Cr.P.C., citing likelihood of committing the grave offence of cheating and forgery. The trial was directed to conclude within one year.
Bail application dismissed; trial directed to conclude within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:191126
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36898 of 2023
Applicant :- Geeta @ Satyawati Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ratish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
to the offence. The offence is grave.
Order Date :- 5.10.2023 S.S.
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail under Section 439 Cr.P.C. in cases of cheating, forgery and criminal conspiracy involving land transactions.
Whether the likelihood of committing the grave offence negates the grounds for bail.
Whether the applicant is correctly implicated in the First Information Report despite claims of false implication.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Geeta @ Satyawati
Vivek Varma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
