Panchsheel v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous because the trial concluded and the applicant was convicted by the trial Court; counsel for applicant absent.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
-Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:191942
Court No. - 74
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29460 of 2020
Applicant :- Panchsheel Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vidhu Bhushan Singh,Amrendra Nath Singh (Senior Adv.) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dr. C.P. Upadhyay,Raju Singh
Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Case called out in the revised list. Counsel for the applicant is not present. Sri C.P. Upadhyay, counsel for the informant submits that the trial has concluded and the applicant has been convicted by the trial Court.
In view of the statement made by counsel for informant, the bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 5.10.2023 S.S.
Digitally signed by :- SIDDHARTH SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Panchsheel
Coram
Vivek Varma
Siddharth Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/29460/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court