Ankur v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Single Judge rejected a bail application for non-prosecution due to absence of the applicant and lack of information regarding the trial's status.
What the court decided
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 36516 of 2017
Applicant :- Ankur Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Yusuf Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application. It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether the bail application survives for consideration or has become infructuous is also not known.
This Court has no option but to reject this bail application for non prosecution.
It is always open for the applicant to file fresh bail application, if required.
Order Date :- 3.4.2023 Rohit
Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ankur
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/36516/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court