Guddu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Civil Judge No. 85, rejected a bail application due to non-appointment of counsel and uncertainty about the status of the trial.
What did the court decide?
Application rejected for non-prosecution; applicant to file fresh application.
What the court decided
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11079 of 2019
Applicant :- Guddu Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashok Kumar Mishra,Rakesh Chandra,Satya Prakash Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Bibhuti Narayan Singh
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application. It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether the bail application survives for consideration or has become infructuous is also not known.
This Court has no option but to reject this bail application for non prosecution.
It is always open for the applicant to file fresh bail application, if required.
Order Date :- 3.4.2023 Abhishek
Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Guddu
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/11079/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court