Sanjay @ Peru v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Single judge dismissed a bail application for want of prosecution when no one appeared on behalf of the applicant on the day listed peremptorily.
What did the court decide?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:179607
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 3553 of 2018
Applicant :- Sanjay @ Peru Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pawankumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Rama Shanker Mishra
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
- List revised.
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not.
- There is also no request for adjournment of this case.
- This bail application, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sanjay @ Peru
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/3553/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court