In this bail application, the applicant sought relief citing a trial pending for six to seven years. The High Court, after examining the Trial Court's explanation regarding the schedule to conclude the trial, found no sufficient reason to grant bail on the charges of 376-D IPC and POCSO.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 67
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 33702 of 2017
Applicant :- Mohit Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Gulab Chandra,Deepak Upadhyay,Phool Singh Yadav,Rajrshi Gupta,Rizwan Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Neeraj Srivastava,Pankaj Srivastava,Sanjay Srivastava,Shad Khan
Hon'ble Rahul Chaturvedi,J.
Order Date :- 6.2.2023 Vandana
Digitally signed by :- VANDANA GAUTAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted in view of the prolonged trial and allegations of delay.
Whether the Appeals Court is satisfied that every genuine effort is being made to conclude the trial.
Mohit Yadav
State of U.P.
Rahul Chaturvedi
Vandana Gautam
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
