Rinku v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The Court rejected a bail application because no one appeared for the applicant and it was unclear if the trial concluded or if the application was infructuous.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29815 of 2017
Applicant :- Rinku Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
List has been revised.
No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this bail application. It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether the bail application survives for consideration or has become infructuous is also not known.
This Court has no option but to reject this bail application for non prosecution.
It is always open for the applicant to file fresh bail application, if required.
Order Date :- 3.4.2023 Rohit
Digitally signed by :- ROHIT DAS High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Rinku
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/29815/2017
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court