Abhay Porwal @ Anshu v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Honble Kr. Pahal, J. allowed an application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The Court held that the applicant's antecedents warranted bail release, applying Section 167(5) Cr.P.C. powers to withdraw from custody, and invoked inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Article 21 of the Constitution.
What did the court decide?
Application for anticipatory bail allowed on ground of antecedents. Rayat Samaj Samuliya Vikas Mandal v. State of U.P. and Siyaram Agarwal v. State of U.P. distinguished.