Allowed

Akhilesh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC13 Sept 2023ABAIL/10281/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed an anticipatory bail application filed by Akhilesh in a police firing case under IPC and Arms Act sections. Despite opposition by the Additional General Prosecutor, bail was granted due to the absence of prior criminal record and lack of injury to police personnel, applying Sushila Aggarwal guidelines with standard conditions imposed.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; applicant released on anticipatory bail with two sureties subject to listed conditions.

Akhilesh Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:177428

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 10281 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Akhilesh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Rajneesh Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

No one is present on behalf of the applicant to press the present anticipatory bail application. Learned A.G.A. is present.

¶8

The lawyers are abstaining from work today. This Court has itself perused the material available on record.

¶9

The present anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant in Case Crime No. 236 of 2023, registered under Sections 307, 411, 413, 414 I.P.C. and 3/25/27 Arms Act at Police Station- Bichhwan, District- Mainpuri with a prayer to enlarge him on anticipatory bail.

¶10

Admittedly, the present case is police party firing. There is no previous criminal history of the applicant. The two cases have been subsequently instituted against the applicant.

¶11

Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail application but has not disputed the fact of no previous criminal history of the applicant and no injury having been sustained by any police personnel.

¶12

On due consideration to the arguments advanced by learned A.G.A. and considering the nature of accusations and antecedents of the applicant, the applicant is liable to be enlarged on anticipatory bail in view of the judgment of Supreme Court in the case of "Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), (2020) 5 SCC 1" . The future contingencies regarding the anticipatory bail being granted to applicant shall also be taken care of as per the aforesaid judgment of the Apex Court.

¶13

In view of the above, the anticipatory bail application of the

¶14

applicant is allowed. Let the accused-applicant- Akhilesh be released forthwith in the aforesaid case crime (supra) on anticipatory bail till the conclusion of trial on furnishing a personal and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions:-

¶15

(i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;

¶16

(ii). that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;

¶17

(iii). that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court;

¶18

(iv). that in case charge-sheet is submitted the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;

¶19

(v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;

¶20

(vi). that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;

¶21

(vii). that in case of breach of any of the above conditions the court concerned shall have the liberty to cancel the bail.

¶22

It is made clear that observations made hereinabove are exclusively for deciding the instant anticipatory bail application and shall not affect the trial.

¶23

Order Date :- 13.9.2023

¶24

Vikas

¶25

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶26

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Akhilesh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhilesh v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Akshay and Another Vs State of U.P.

Subhash Chandra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Govardhan Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Neha Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Syyed Moazzam Ali Vs State of U.P. and Another

Rajkumar Vs State of U.P.