Dismissed
Vikesh @ Vikas v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/28097/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed by Allahabad High Court Court No. 69 due to non-appearance of applicant's counsel and lack of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:193830
¶2
Court No. - 69
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28097 of 2022
¶4
Applicant :- Vikesh @ Vikas Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Amar Singh Yadav,Jitendra Kumar,Purushottam Dixit
¶5
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
¶6
- List revised.
¶7
- None appears for the applicant to press this bail application.
¶8
- Sri Jitendra Kumar, learned counsel for the first informant and Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the State are present.
¶9
- Since there is no representation from the side of the applicant, it appears that the learned counsel for the applicant has lost interest in the matter.
¶10
- The bail application is dismissed for non prosecution.
¶11
Order Date :- 9.10.2023 K.K. Maurya
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Vikesh @ Vikas
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
AI extract
Samit Gopal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · October
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/28097/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court