Deepak Prajapati v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed as infructuous because the State submitted that the trial was concluded and the applicant had already been convicted.
Bail application dismissed as infructuous because the State submitted that the trial was concluded and the applicant had already been convicted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:192911
Court No. - 69
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 34422 of 2018
Applicant :- Deepak Prajapati Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Akshay Mohiley,Ankit Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Samit Gopal,J.
Order Date :- 6.10.2023/K.K. Maurya
(Samit Gopal,J.)
Digitally signed by :- KAMLESH KUMAR MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Prajapati
Samit Gopal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court