Waseem v. State of Up
Case brief
What is this about?
The bail application was dismissed for non-prosecution as no counsel appeared on behalf of the applicant and no consent was received for the appointment of an Amicus Curiae, notwithstanding notices issued.
What the court decided
Court No. - 76
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22976 of 2020
Applicant :- Waseem Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ravitendra Pratap Singh Chandel,A.C.Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
- List has been revised.
- No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press the bail application.
- By order dated 25.8.2023 notices were issued to the applicant for ensuring appearance of the counsel for the applicant on the next date or to give consent for appointment of Amicus Curiae.
- Today learned counsel for the applicant is not present in the revised list nor any consent has been received from the applicant for appointment of Amicus Curiae. As per the office report dated 25.9.2023, the service has been made on the applicant in pursuance to the order dated 25.8.2023.
- Considering the fact that no consent has been received from the applicant for appointment of Amicus Curiae and learned counsel for the applicant is also not present in the revised list, the present bail application is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Waseem
Coram
Vikram D. Chauhan
Vishwa Mohan Arora
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/22976/2020
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court