Gajendra v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court dismissed the second bail application filed by Gajendra as infructuous on the ground that the trial court had already convicted the applicant.
What did the court decide?
The bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:155741
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 22953 of 2023
Applicant :- Gajendra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Tarun Jha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Kamal Singh
Hon'ble Mrs. Sadhna Rani (Thakur),J.
Learned counsel for the applicant is present. According to him, the trial court case has been decided into conviction, hence second bail application has become infructuous.
The second bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.8.2023 T.S.
Digitally signed by :- TRIBHUWAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Gajendra
Coram
Sadhna Rani (Thakur)
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/22953/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court