Allowed

Chandrabhan v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC3 Aug 2023BAIL/56968/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous bail application, the Allahabad High Court allowed the bail prayer for the applicant, Chandrabhan, who was already on bail in related cases. The court granted release on personal bond with two sureties without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case.

What did the court decide?

Release of applicant on personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 25,000 each under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

Chandrabhan Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:156126

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 56968 of 2022

¶4

Applicant :- Chandrabhan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ritesh Singh,Suresh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

2. Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the sole case shown in the gang chart. The copy of the bail order has been handed over in the Court today, is taken on record. The applicant is in custody since 19.08.2022.

¶8

3. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the aforementioned cases shown in the gang chart and without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail.

¶10

5. Thus, the present application is allowed .

¶11

6. Let the applicant- Chandrabhan be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No. 564 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, registered at Police Station- Kotwali, District- Shahjahanpur, on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 3.8.2023 Kalp Nath Singh

¶16

Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chandrabhan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chandrabhan v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Anis Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Fundan Vs State of U.P.

Sumit Kumar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Nem Singh Vs State of U.P. and Another

Provincial Rakshak Dal Employees Welfare Association and 2 Others Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rajveer Singh and 62 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another