Allowed

Ranjeet Kumar @ Jhulli Nishad v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC14 Jul 2023BAIL/1903/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was heard by the Allahabad High Court. The court, considering the applicant's lack of criminal history, evidentiary disputes regarding his role, and jail overcrowding under Article 21, granted bail with stringent conditions while leaving the final conclusion to the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail upon furnishing a personal bond and two sureties with strict conditions regarding attendance and conduct.

Ranjeet Kumar @ Jhulli Nishad Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:140776

¶2

Court No. - 64

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1903 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Ranjeet Kumar @ Jhulli Nishad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahendra Kumar Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶8

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Ranjeet Kumar @ Jhulli Nishad, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 142 of 2021, under Sections 304 IPC, Police Station Kotewali City, DistrictMirzapur, during pendency of trial.

¶9

There is allegation against co-accused, Lalla and Gappu, of committing the offence of culpable homicide not amounting to murder with common intention.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that on the basis of CCTV footage, the applicant has been implicated in this case wherein he was last seen with the deceased. The role of causing murder to the deceased has been assigned to co-accused, Lalla, by brick under the influence of smack. The applicant has no criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since 14.12.2021. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶11

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶12

Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping in view uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P.(Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, judgement dated 11.7.2022 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like

¶13

amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶14

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶15

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶19

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶20

Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶21

Order Date :- 14.7.2023 Ruchi Agrahari

¶22

Digitally signed by :- RUCHI AGRAHARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ranjeet Kumar @ Jhulli Nishad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Kumar @ Jhulli Nishad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Deepak Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Sonu Vs State of U.P.

Ram Prakash Vs State of U.P.

Chetram @ Maithli Vs State of U.P.

Rohit Vs State of U.P.

Harish Vs State of U.P.