Dismissed
Ram Prakash v. State of U.P.
Allahabad HCBAIL/13027/2021
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant on the date fixed, despite the case being listed peremptorily.
What did the court decide?
None. Bail application dismissed for want of prosecution.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:139211
¶2
Court No. - 64
¶3
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13027 of 2021
¶4
Applicant :- Ram Prakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dhirendra Pratap Singh,Rakesh Kumar Yadav,Ram Prasad Yadav,Sabhajeet Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
¶5
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
¶6
- List revised.
¶7
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
¶8
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
¶9
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not. Whether the applicant has been charge-sheeted or exonerated.
¶10
- This bail application, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
¶11
Order Date :- 13.7.2023 Rohit
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- applicant
Ram Prakash
Coram
AI extract
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · July
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/13027/2021
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court