Allowed

Mahima Sharma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC18 May 2023BAIL/10206/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous bail application, the High Court allowed bail to the applicant, Mahima Sharma, on personal bond conditions, clarifying that conditions must be followed without rigidity during the inquiry proceedings.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond with conditions to appear before the court on demand, not visit restricted areas, and assist in trial without absconding.

Mahima Sharma Vs State of U.P. — Allahabad HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:109172

¶2

Court No. - 78

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 10206 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Mahima Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dur Vijay Singh

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosfndk efgek 'kekZ dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 742 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 306 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk yksuh] ftyk xkft;kckn esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa muds ofj"B vf/koDrk Jh oh0ih0 JhokLro ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosfndk dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosfndk ds ifr xkSjo vkosfndk ds lkFk 'kknh ds le; bZ Vh oh pSuy esa mPp in ij dk;Zjr Fks] dksjksuk dky esa vkosfndk ds ifr dh ukSdjh NwV x;h Fkh bl dkj.k os fdjk, ds edku dks NksM+dj vyhx<+ vk x, rFkk dkQh vkfFkZd raxh ls tw> jgs Fks] fnYyh esa vdsys jgus ds nkSjku vkosfndk ds ifr dk laca/k fdlh vU; efgyk ls gks x;k Fkk ftlds pyrs vkosfndk ls ckrphr djuk cgqr de dj fn;k] ftldh f’kdk;r vkosfndk us vius lkl llqj ls dh] rFkk dfFkr QthZ ,oa cukoVh lqlkbM uksV djhc 18 fnu ckn foospuk esa QthZ rjhds ls lfEefyr fd;k x;k gSA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd bl izdj.k esa lg vfHk;qDr iatkch 'kekZ mQZ xxu 'kekZ dh tekur tekur vkosnu i= la0 49132 lu 2022 esa bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 25&1&2023 }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS rFkk vkosfndk dk dsl mlh ds leku gS] vkosfndk funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 29&9&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosfndk dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;k] fdUrq ;g Lohdkj fd;k fd vkosfndk dk dsl mDr lg vfHk;qDrksa ds leku gSA

¶10

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosfndk dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosfndk dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosfndk foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxhA

¶13

2& vkosfndk vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxh@/kedk;sxh ughaA

¶14

3& vkosfndk U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxh] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxh rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxhA

¶15

4& vkosfndk tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxh vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxh u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxhA

¶16

5& vkosfndk izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxh u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxh] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶17

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosfndk dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA fn0 % 18&5&2023

¶18

ds0lh0flag

¶19

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Mahima Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mahima Sharma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Avnish Vs State of U.P.

Akhilesh Yadav Alias Puturoo Vs State of U.P.

Kisun Kunwar Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Rinki Vs State of U.P.

Chotu Pandey Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others