The Allahabad High Court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail, directing the applicant to file a regular bail application within one month while forbidding coercive action for that period.
No coercive action to be taken against the applicant for one month; directed to file regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:169446
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9550 of 2023
Applicant :- Babita Kesarwani Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Dhiraj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
(Justice Krishan Pahal)
Order Date :- 23.8.2023 Shalini
Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether interference is required in the anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in the present case.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and anotherReferred¶9
2022 SCC Online SC 825 · Who else cites this
Babita Kesarwani
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
