Dismissed

Surjeet and 3 Others v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Aug 2023BAIL/51429/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application (Bear No. 51429 of 2019) filed by Surjeet and others in a case involving Sections 147, 148, 323, 307 IPC. The court directed the applicants to surrender and file a regular bail application within one month, relying on Satender Kumar Antil guidelines. No coercive action was permitted during this period.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender and file regular bail application within one month; no coercive action during this period.

Surjeet and 3 Others Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:168774

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51429 of 2019

¶4

Applicant :- Surjeet And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anurag Dubey,Ahtisham Hussain Hashmi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Anurag Dubey, learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri Deepak Kumar Singh, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.366 of 2019, under Sections 147, 148, 323, 307 I.P.C., P.S. Bhongaon, District Mainpuri.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicants.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Surjeet, Durvesh @ Rajpratap, Narsi and Videsh Singh in the above case.

¶13

Order Date :- 22.8.2023 Vikas

¶14

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Surjeet and 3 Others v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Surjeet and 3 Others v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Haroon and Another Vs State of U.P.

Saurabh Srivastwa Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Raghvendra Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Mohd. Imran and 4 Others Vs State of U.P.

Banarasi Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Salimuddin Vs State of U.P.