Ravi v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file regular bail. Applicant directed to surrender within one month; coercive action stayed for that period.
What did the court decide?
Applicant directed to surrender within one month; no coercive action during this period.
What the court decided
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 946 of 2023
Applicant :- Ravi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Vineet Singh Parmar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
- List has been revised.
- Heard Sri Ramkher Singh, Advocate holding brief of Sri Vineet Singh Parmar, learned counsel for applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State.
- The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.463 of 2022, under Sections 452, 323, 354, 504, 506 I.P.C., P.S. Sadar Bazar, District Saharanpur.
- After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .
- Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant period of protection and dispose of the anticipatory bail application by directing surrender for regular bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Ravi
Coram
Krishan Pahal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/946/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court