Anticipatory bail application dismissed as infructuous since the investigation had concluded and the charge sheet was submitted at the time of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 80
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 889 of 2022 Applicant :- Dinesh Kr. Pandey
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home And Others Counsel for Applicant :- Vikash Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- Anurag Vajpeyi,Praveen Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Subhash Chandra Sharma,J.
List has been revised.No one is present from the side of applicant even in the revised call. Learned A.G.A for the State is present.
It appears that the prayer for anticipatory bail was made during pendency of investigation but as submitted by learned A.G.A that now after conclusion of investigation the charge sheet has been submitted. Therefore, this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 27.1.2023 G.S
Digitally signed by :- GHAN SHYAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Dinesh Kr. Pandey
State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home
Subhash Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
