In this brief order, the Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application where the applicants had not appeared to argue the case since June 2021.
disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate remedy
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 8849 of 2021
Applicant :- Sameer And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kiran Tiwari,Mahesh Chandra Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
List revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicants to press this case.
Mr. K.P. Pathak, learned AGA is present.
Perusal of the order sheet goes to show that the matter has not been argued by learned counsel for the applicant since 16.06.2021.
On the basis of instructions, learned AGA submits that the charge sheet has already been submitted in this case on 16.05.2021.
In view of the above, this anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, disposed of with liberty to avail appropriate remedy as provided under the law.
Order Date :- 2.2.2023 Jitendra/-
Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sameer And 4 Others
State Of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
Jitendra Kumar Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
