In this matter, the court ruled that the anticipatory bail application became infructuous as the applicants had already been arrested, leading to the rejection of the plea without further proceedings.
Application rejected as infructuous due to subsequent arrest of applicants.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 805 of 2023
Applicant :- Ranjit And 4 Others Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Narendra Kumar,Pradeep Kumar Maurya
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ram Raksha Tiwari
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have already arrested, therefore, this application has become infructuous, therefore, the same may be rejected as infructuous.
Hence, there is no justification or need to proceed further in the matter, the application is rejected as infructuous.
Order Date :- 28.3.2023 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application is viable given that the applicants have already been arrested.
Ranjit and 4 Others
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
