The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad dismissed an anticipatory bail application. The court held that since the police had submitted a final report and no proceedings were pending, there was no apprehension of arrest, rendering the application devoid of justification.
Application disposed of as final report was submitted and no arrest apprehension existed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 679 of 2023
Applicant :- Tahir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Janardan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
It appears from the perusal of the record that in this matter, after investigation, final report has been submitted by the police and no proceeding is now being taken in this matter.
Since final report has been submitted in the matter, there is no question of apprehension of arrest of the applicant.
Hence, there is no justification or need to proceed further in the matter.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 4.4.2023 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application can be disposed of when final report is submitted and no arrest apprehension exists.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Tahir
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
