The High Court held that the anticipatory bail application became infructuous as the applicant had already been arrested. The application was dismissed as no further proceedings were justified.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed as infructuous due to the applicant's arrest.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2509 of 2023
Applicant :- Udayveer Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Kushwaha,Geeta Kushwaha
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous, as the applicant has been arrested.
In view of that, there is no justification or need to proceed further in the matter.
Anticipatory bail application is, accordingly, dismissed, as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 3.4.2023 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application needs to be decided view of the applicant's arrest?
Udayveer Singh
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
