The court dismissed an unpressed anticipatory bail application because the applicant conceded moving the High Court directly without first approaching the competent court below.
Order dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file the application before the sessions court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 634 of 2023 Applicant :- Ganga Prasad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shamshuddin Khan (S U Khan) Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Heard Sri Shamshuddin Khan, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri O.P. Mishra, learned AGA for the State.
At the very outset, it is conceded by the applicant that he has directly moved an application of anticipatory bail before this Court without first approaching the competent court below.
In these circumstances, the applicant seeks not to press this anticipatory bail application, hence it is dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a suitable application/anticipatory bail application before the concerned sessions court as per law.
Order Date :- 13.2.2023 #Vikram/-
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Ganga Prasad
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
