Anticipatory bail application dismissed in default as applicants failed to appear on subsequent hearing dates and proceeded with no representative.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 12301 of 2022
Applicant :- Asif Malik And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Suneel Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Abdul Mazeed,Mohd Arif
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None responds for the applicants. Learned AGA for the State is present.
Even none appeared on behalf of the applicants on previous date i.e., 03.02.2023 when the matter was taken up for hearing.
It appears that the applicants have lost interest for some reason in this case. As none is present to press this anticipatory bail application, the same is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 13.2.2023 #Vikram/-
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Asif Malik And Another
State of U.P.
Jyotsna Sharma
Vikram Gupta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
