Disposed

Paramveer v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC26 May 2023ABAIL/6155/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. without interfering, directing the applicant to surrender within one month and file a regular bail application governed by Satender Kumar Antil guidelines. No coercive action will be initiated for one month.

What did the court decide?

No interim anticipatory bail granted; applicant directed to surrender within one month and file regular bail application.

Paramveer Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:117865

¶2

Court No. - 83

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 6155 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Paramveer Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashutosh Dwivedi,Lalit Prakash Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Lalit Prakash, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Nitin Kesharwani, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.119 of 2023, under Sections 379, 411 I.P.C. and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, P.S. Refinery, District Mathura.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

(Krishan Pahal, J.)

¶14

Order Date :- 26.5.2023 Ravi Kant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Paramveer v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Paramveer v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Uday Bahadur Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ashutosh Dubey Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Harikesh Chauhan Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Vijay Lakshmi Singh Vs State of U.P.

Durgesh Tiwari Vs State of U.P. . and Another

Rajkumar Srivastava Vs State of U.P.