Parshuram v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 569 of 2020
Applicant :- Parshuram Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Perdeep Kumar Vishnoi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
List revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicant to press this application, however, learned A.G.A. for the State is present.
Perusal of the order sheet goes to show that the matter was referred to larger Bench of this Court. Reference stands answered in the Full Bench Decision in the case of Ankit Bharti Vs. State of U.P. and another, reported in 2020 (3) ADJ 575 (FB) .
In view of above, the aforesaid application is not maintainable as the applicant has directly approached this Court without availing proper remedy to approach before the court below.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not maintainable.
Order Date :- 13.1.2023 Rahul.
Digitally signed by :- RAHUL GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parshuram
Rahul Goswami
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court