Disposed

Dara Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Jul 2023ABAIL/5396/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The applicant sought anticipatory bail in a case under IPC 411 and Excise Act provisions. The court disposed of the application, directing surrender within one month and that any regular bail application be decided per the Satender Kumar Antil guidelines. No coercive action permitted during this period.

What did the court decide?

Disposal of anticipatory bail application; direction to surrender within one month; no coercive action during this period; future regular bail application to be decided per Satender Kumar Antil guidel

Dara Singh Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:134015

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5396 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Dara Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar,Sarvesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Durga Chandra Yadav, Advocate holding brief of Sri Sarvesh Kumar, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.265 of 2020, under Section 411 I.P.C. and 60/63 Excise Act, P.S. Soroan, District Prayagraj.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

(Krishan Pahal, J.)

¶14

Order Date :- 7.7.2023 Ravi Kant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Dara Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dara Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Rajan Mishra Vs State of U.P. and Another

Banti Mishra @ Vineet Kumar Vs State of Up

Ballan Vs State of U.P.

Arjun Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Rashmi Verma Vs State of U.P.

Dilip Vs State of U.P. and Another