Brief of application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a mining case involving offences under IPC and MMDR Act, 1957. Court directed applicant to file regular bail and surrender within six weeks.
Direction to file regular bail within six weeks and surrender; no coercive action for six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:133918
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3398 of 2023
Applicant :- Banti Mishra @ Vineet Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Kashyap,V.P. Singh Kashyap,Yogesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
[Krishan Pahal, J.]
Order Date :- 6.7.2023 Vikas
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in the present case involving mining-related offences.
Whether an anticipatory bail application can be disposed of by directing the filing of a regular bail application.
Whether coercive action shall be taken against the applicant during the interim period.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and AnotherRelied on¶9
Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Banti Mishra
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
