In an anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C., the learned counsel for the opposite party submitted that the applicant had already been arrested on 12.5.2023. The court held the application infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:117126
Court No. - 81
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 5295 of 2023
Applicant :- Ravinder Kumar Sharma Opposite Party :- Union Of India And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shailesh Kumar Pathak Counsel for Opposite Party :- A.S.G.I.,Dhananjay Awasthi,Krishna Agarawal,Parv Agarwal
Hon'ble Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan,J.
No one is present for the applicant, when this case is taken up for hearing.
Shri Dhananjay Awasthi, learned counsel for opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 is present.
Shri Dhananjay Awasthi appearng for opposite party Nos. 2 and 3 both by submitting a Memo of Arrest, pertaining to the applicant, submits that the instant application has become infructutous, as the applicant-Ravinder Kumar Sharma has already been arrested in connection with the instant case on 12.5.2023.
Thus, the instant anticipatory bail application appears to have become infructuous and is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 25.5.2023
Sumaira
Digitally signed by :- SUMAIRA AQUIL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant who has already been arrested in the underlying case.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ravinder Kumar Sharma
Union Of India
2 Others
Mohd. Faiz Alam Khan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
