Single judge allowed anticipatory bail to Chandan Gupta in cases involving cow slaughter and arms charges, granting bail with conditions to appear for interrogation and not interfere with witnesses.
Anticipatory bail allowed with conditions to appear for interrogation, not tamper with evidence, not leave India, and not intimidate witnesses.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:101529
Court No. - 83
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4511 of 2023
Applicant :- Chandan Gupta Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kalp Dev Mishra,Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
State can move appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail.
(i). that the applicant shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii). that the applicant shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence;
(iii). that the applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court;
(iv). that in case charge-sheet is submitted the applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial;
(v). that the applicant shall not pressurize/ intimidate the prosecution witness;
(vi). that the applicant shall appear before the trial court on each date fixed unless personal presence is exempted;
(vii). that in case of breach of any of the above conditions the court below shall have the liberty to cancel the bail.
(Krishan Pahal, J.)
Order Date :- 11.5.2023 Ravi Kant
Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is eligible for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in the offences under U.P. Prevention of Cow Slaughter Act and Arms Act.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi)Relied on¶14
Sushila Aggarwal Vs. State (NCT of Delhi), (2020) 5 SCC 1 · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Chandan Gupta
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
