Anticipatory bail application dismissed in default as none of the applicants appeared for hearing despite revised call and previous notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 4283 of 2020
Applicant :- Shehzad And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Gaurav Pundir,Mahipal Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
None responds for the applicants despite revised call. From perusal of the ordersheet, it appears that none appeared for the applicants even on previous date of hearing.
Hence this anticipatory bail application is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 3.1.2023 Asha
Digitally signed by :- ASHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shehzad And 2 Others
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
