S.C. Bahniwal (Suresh Chandra Bahniwal) v. State of U.P. and 2 Ohters
Case brief
What is this about?
Anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., case no. 3906 of 2021, applicant S.C. Bahniwal (Suresh Chandra Bahniwal), opposite party State of U.P. and 2 others, counsel for applicant Santosh Kumar Kesarwani, G.A. for opposite party, Allahabad High Court, Raj Beer Singh, J., order dated 12.10.2023. Dismissed for want of prosecution due to repeated non-appearance of the applicant's side over four-five dates; A.G.A. present. Purely procedural dismissal; no merits of anticipatory bail decided, no cases cited, no quantum involved. Limited value as precedent on anticipatory bail law.
What did the court decide?
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed for want of prosecution, none having appeared on behalf of the applicant for the last four-five dates. ¶7