This court dismissed an application for anticipatory bail as infructuous because the applicant had already surrendered to the trial court and been granted bail. Counsel for the applicant argued the application was no longer viable.
The application for anticipatory bail is dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:196767
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3100 of 2022
Applicant :- Ajay Lohia Opposite Party :- Central Bureau Of Investigation And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rajrshi Gupta,Rizwan Ahamad,Sr. Advocate,Vinayak Mithal
Counsel for Opposite Party :- Sanjay Kumar Yadav,G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Neeraj
Digitally signed by :- NEERAJ KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application is infructuous since the applicant has surrendered and been granted bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Lohia
Central Bureau Of Investigation
Another
Raj Beer Singh
Neeraj
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
