In a criminal anticipatory bail application, the applicant failed to appear and was represented by no counsel. The court dismissed the application in default as the case was not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 85
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3895 of 2022 Applicant :- Vinod Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Jyotsna Sharma,J.
Case called out in the revised list. None responds for the applicant. Learned AGA for the State is present.
It may be noted that on last occasion none appeared on behalf of the applicant when the matter was called up for hearing on 10.06.2022.
It appears that the applicant has lost interest for some reason in this case. As none is present to press this anticipatory bail application, the same is dismissed in default.
Order Date :- 12.1.2023 #Vikram/-
Digitally signed by :- VIKRAM GUPTA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Vinod
Jyotsna Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
