Deepak Rawat v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 360 of 2023
Applicant :- Deepak Rawat Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Rahul Singh Dahiya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous, as the present applicant has already been granted regular bail in the matter.
In view of the aforesaid, there is no justification or need to proceed further in the matter.
The anticipatory bail application is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 11.4.2023 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Deepak Rawat
State Of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court