Raju Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Court denied anticipatory bail to applicant in cases involving Sections 147, 323, 325, 308, 504 IPC. Ruled that matter is not fit for bail. Directed lower court to decide future bail application per Satender Kumar Antil guidelines.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail refused; future bail petition to be decided per Satender Kumar Antil directions.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3601 of 2023
Applicant :- Raju Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Anil Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Present Anticipatory Bail Application has been filed with the prayer to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant - Raju Kumar in Case Crime No.224 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 325, 308, 504 IPC, Police Station - Gola, District – Gorakhpur.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
It has been argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that applicant is innocent and they has apprehension of his arrest in the above-mentioned case, whereas there is no credible evidence against him. Allegations levelled against the applicant are false. The investigation of the case has been completed and charge-sheet has been filed and cognizance has been taken by the Court concerned. It has been submitted that in case applicant is granted anticipatory bail, he shall not misuse the liberty of bail and would obey all conditions of bail.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in light of the facts and settled law principles.
Whether the case before this court is a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail till the end of trial.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Raju Kumar
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · April
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/3601/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court