In an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C., the matter was dismissed as infructuous because no FIR was lodged against the applicants and there was no apprehension of arrest.
The anticipatory bail application was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3368 of 2021
Applicant :- Shri Arvinder Pal Singh And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
List revised. No one has appeared on behalf of the applicants to press this application. Learned AGA for the State is present.
On the basis of instructions, learned AGA submits that FIR has not been lodged against the applicants and there is no apprehension of arrest of them, therefore, the matter has become infructuous.
Accordingly, the present anticipatory bail application is clearly rendered infructuous and is dismissed as such.
Order Date :- 6.2.2023
S. Singh
Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application is maintainable when no FIR has been lodged against the applicants.
Whether there is any apprehension of arrest of the applicants justifying the grant of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Arvinder Pal Singh And 2 Others
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
