The High Court of Allahabad dismissed an anticipatory bail application filed by Sachin Pandey for want of prosecution, as the applicant's counsel was absent to press the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 77
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2095 of 2021
Applicant :- Sachin Pandey Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ramesh Chandra Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Akhil Ranjan
Hon'ble Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.
List has been revised.
Nobody is present on behalf of applicant to press this application even in the revised call. Learned Standing Counsel for the Staterespondent is present.
Earlier on 3.2.2021, the anticipatory bail was granted to the applicant after which on several occasions, the matter has not been argued by learned Counsel for the applicant .
The present application is, accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.2.2023 S. Singh
Digitally signed by :- SAVITA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Sachin Pandey
State of U.P.
Manju Rani Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
