Disposed

Ajay v. State of U.P. and Another

Allahabad HC8 Aug 2023ABAIL/3125/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal, J. disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. The court directed the applicant to surrender within one month. In case of filing a regular bail application, it shall be decided in view of the guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil. No coercive action is permissible during this period.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender before concerned court within one month; no coercive action admissible for this period; regular bail application to be decided citing Satender Kumar Antil.

Ajay Vs State of U.P. and Another — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:159358

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3125 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Ajay Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sudhir Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Sudhir Kumar, learned counsel for applicant as well as Sri Anith Kumar Shukla, learned Additional Government Advocate for State.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Case Crime No.388 of 2022, under Sections 307, 324, 504, 34 I.P.C., P.S. Mawana, District Meerut.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another reported in 2022 SCC OnLine SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer of learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference U/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicant shall surrender before the concerned court below within one month from today and in case a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶14

Order Date :- 8.8.2023 Vikas

¶15

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Ajay v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ajay v. State of U.P. and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pappu Pandit @ Uma Shankar Vs State of U.P. and Another

Gajendra Singh Vs State of U.P.

Anil Kumar and 4 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Chandu @ Chand Mohd Vs State of U.P.

Aman Chauhan@ Aman Rana Vs State of U.P. and Another

Kuldeep Pachauri Vs State of U.P.