Single judge anticipatory bail application under S. 438 Cr.P.C. was dismissed as infructuous because the court found the application no longer viable due to the absence of the counsel for the informant and the submission by the applicant's counsel.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:158061
Court No. - 72
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17516 of 2021
Applicant :- Gajendra Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Srivastava,Alka Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Sanjay Kr. Srivastava
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
Order Date :- 7.8.2023 Vikas
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the present anticipatory bail application has become infructuous due to the absence of the counsel for the informant.
Gajendra Singh
Krishan Pahal
Vikas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
