The court dismissed the anticipatory bail application as infructuous because the applicant had already been arrested in the matter, making further proceedings unnecessary. The application was disposed without further order.
No bail granted; application dismissed as applicant was already arrested.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2983 of 2023
Applicant :- Shyambir Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Atul Singh Chauhan,Rajesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant states that this anticipatory bail application has become infructuous, as the present applicant has been arrested in this matter.
In view of the aforesaid, there is no justification or need to proceed further in the matter.
The application is disposed of accordingly.
Order Date :- 12.4.2023 ss
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Shyambir
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
