Anil and Another v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Infructuous anticipatory bail application dismissed. The High Court held the application had become infructuous and dismissed it.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:157939
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2339 of 2023
Applicant :- Anil And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Dharmendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dinesh Pathak
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
- Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that this application has become infructuous, therefore, the same may be dismissed as infructuous.
- Accordingly, this application is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Order Date :- 7.8.2023 Shivangi
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Anil
Coram
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · August
- Registered
- Case no.
- ABAIL/2339/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court