The applicant did not appear before the court despite repeated calls. No request for adjournment was made. The High Court dismissed the application for want of prosecution, indicating lack of interest by the applicants.
Application dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 3858 of 2020
Applicant :- Intzar Aliuas Mohd. Intjar And 2 Ors. Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anr. Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Naushad,Manoj Singh,Rajiv Sisodia
Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,M.Faisal Khan
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 4.8.2023 safi
Digitally signed by :- MAHBOOB SAFI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the anticipatory bail application should be dismissed for want of prosecution due to the applicants' non-appearance.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Intzar Aliuas Mohd. Intjar And 2 Ors.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
