Hamza Sufyan v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2306 of 2020
Applicant :- Hamza Sufyan Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Zain Abbas Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has already been granted regular bail from the trial Court, therefore, this application has become infructuous, therefore, the same may be rejected as infructuous.
Hence, there is no justification or need to proceed further in the matter, the application is rejected as infructuous.
Order Date :- 29.3.2023 Fhd
Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Hamza Sufyan
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court