Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. was disposed of after the Learned A.G.A. submitted that the accused received notice under Section 41(A) and has no apprehension of arrest, rendering further proceedings unnecessary.
Application disposed of; no anticipatory bail granted; no non-bailable order issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:116508
Court No. - 84
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 2275 of 2023
Applicant :- Mukesh Kumar Tyagi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Sujeet Kumar,Chhaya Gupta Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order date: 24.5.2023 Nitika Sri.
Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail application needs to be proceeded further when notice under Section 41(A) of Cr.P.C. was served and there is no apprehension of arrest.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Mukesh Kumar Tyagi
State of U.P.
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Nitika Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
